WSW EDITORIAL

With the recent passage of the Reagan budget, the much-predicted hardships to fall on women, children, minorities, the elderly and the poor will soon become a reality. The recent rioting in Britain

News

Vol. 9, no. 2

by Mary Walsh

may well foreshadow the grim future of this country as a result of the new budget cuts.

Nor are things hopeful on the judicial front, especially for women. The U.S. Supreme Court in re-

CONTENTS

National

Everything You Must Know About Tampons.......6 Fire in the Rain.......

.8

Wage Discrimination...

.4

The Honor Quilt.......

Zap Brigade Update.......

.5

Black Feminism...

..9

Interview with Zap Brigade Member....

.5

Letters.........

.....2

San Jose Strike.....

.4

Local

Viewpoint.

.9

CWW: Handwriting, Not Handwringing.............3

Kathy Thomas Trial Update..

.3

Find It Fastest.....

..back cover

Cleveland Rape Crisis Center.....

..2

Classified Ads........

Features and Reviews

The Cancer Journals......

7

What's Happening.

cover photos by Jan McElwain-Bell (top)

and Jeanne Van Atta (bottom)

What She Wants

.15

......12-15

What She Wants usually goes to production the third weekend of the month. Copy should be submitted by the 15th of each month so that we can discuss it and edit collectively at our editorial meetings. Contact us for specific deadlines. Please print or type articles. Mail material to WSW, P. O. Box 18465, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118.

WHAT SHE WANTS IS:

A MONTHLY NEWS JOURNAL PRODUCED FOR ALL WOMEN. We always like input from our readers in the form of articles, personal experiences, poetry, art, announcements, and letters. We welcome women who are willing to help us in specific areas of the paper (writing, lay-out, advertising, distribution, publicity, etc.) and/or who are interested in our collective.

WHAT SHE WANTS ADVOCATES:

...equal and civil rights

...the right to earnings based on our need, merit, and interest ...access to job training, salaries, and promotions we choose

...the right to organize in unions and coalitions to advance our cause ...the right to decent health care and health information

...the right to safe, effective birth control and to safe, legal abortions ...the right to accept or reject motherhood

...the right to choose and express sexual preference without harassment ...access to quality education and freedom from prejudice in learning materials

SUBSCRIPTIONS:

A one-year subscription to WSW includes

10 regular monthly issues

-

Individual $6.00 Contributing $15.00 Sustaining — $25.00 Non-Profit Org. $10.00

-

For Profit Org. $15.00

DISTRIBUTION OUTLETS:

East: Appletree Books, Coventry Books, CWRU Bookstore, Food Communities, Food Project, Hemming & Hulbert Booksellers

Central: Barnes & Noble, Publix Book Mart, WomenSpace

West: American Indian Center, CCC Bookstore, Plants Plus, Six Steps Down Chagrin Falls: Little Professor Book Center

Akron: Cooperative Market

Kent: Kent Natural Foods Store

Columbus: Fan the Flames Bookstore

Boston, MA: New Words Bookstore

Business Group

Marycatherine Krause/Coordinator Alana Clampitt

Dianne Fishman

Julie Gress

Mary Redlinger

Editorial Group

Gail Powers/Coordinator Marycatherine Krause/Coordinator Loretta Feller/Coordinator Virginia Carman

Lorie Getz

right @-1981

Production Group

Linda Jane/Coordinator Mary Walsh/Coordinator Willow Bentley Vega Buchbinder Jean Loria

Pat O'Malley

· Randi Powers Lesley Rogan Barb Silverberg Michele Vanderlip

41

cent weeks has decided several cases which reflect a subtle but distinct backward trend in enforcement of women's rights. And in the Ohio Supreme Court, judges in the Kathy Thomas case seem to have repudiated the whole idea of the "battered wife syndrome" as evidence of a woman's state of mind (see article on page 3 of this issue).

In the U.S. Supreme Court, three decisions made this spring signal that the Court is using a new and less stringent standard to determine whether a sexbased distinction is lawful. During most of the 1970's, the Court consistently ruled that a sex-based law could be upheld only if it was "substantially related to achieving an important governmental interest," and if a law that treated the sexes equally could not serve that interest as well as one that differentiated. Thus the burden was on the government to prove a compelling need to discriminate; if it could not, the statute fell. However, in recent decisions the standard used by the Court is whether men and women are "similarly situated" in a particular situation; if they are not, a sex-based law can be upheld whatever its discriminatory effects.

The most noteworthy case in which this new standard was used was Rostker v. Goldberg, decided June 25, which held that Congress may limit draft registration to men. Justice Rehnquist, writing for the 6-3 majority, did not consider the central issue of whether including women in the draft would hamper military effectiveness. Instead, the opinion stated that since by Federal law and military policy women are not eligible to serve in combat positions, men and women are not similarly situated for purposes of a draft or draft registration. He based this opinion on the dubious assertion that "the purpose of registration is to develop a pool of potential combat troops". The tortured logic of this position is obvious, since many functions in support of military units are now well performed by the 150,000 women volunteers currently on active service. As Justice Marshall pointed out in his dissent, the opinion "places its imprimatur on one of the most potent remaining public expressions of ancient canards about the proper role of women".

Other cases in which the "similarly situated" standard has been used recently concerned the upholding of a statutory rape law that punished only men for having sex with an underage partner, and one that held that a military pension cannot become part of the property settlement in a divorce. In the former case, the Court held that since only girls can become pregnant, they are not similarly situated to young boys; therefore the state can punish a man but not a woman for having relations with a teenager. Presumably, the purpose of the statute was to protect young people, not merely to avoid pregnancy in the young; thus the application of the "similarly situated" standard actually perverts the law. And in the military pension case, the negative effects clearly fall overwhelmingly on women dependents of military husbands.

The main problem with the "similarly situated" standard, if the Court continues to use it, is that the burden will shift to women to show why a sex-based distinction is not valid, rather than requiring the state to defend its validity. Since for various economic, social, physiological and other reasons women and men are not similarly situated in many areas of life, this change on the part of the Court signals an increasingly uphill judicial battle for women's rights. It is impossible to predict what impact the nomination and confirmation of Sandra O'Connor to the (continued on page 2)

New WSW Phone Number

Leave message for WSW at 791-4840. We will return your call as soon as possible.

Application to mail at second class postage rates is pending at Cleveland, Ohio. What She Wants is published monthly except August and February. Yearly subscription rates are $6 (individual), $10 (non-profit organization), $15 (profit organization), $15 (contributing) and $25 (sustaining). What She Warus ir published by Whist ita, Inc., P ̧O: ̧Box 18465, Cleveland

Heights,

44118

July-August, 1981/What She Wants/Page 1